Monday, February 15, 2010

Judge orders trial for fatal DUI suspect

SAN FERNANDO - After his second DUI conviction last year, Marco Valencia visited a coroner's office to see the dead victims of drunk drivers as part of a court-ordered drug program.

He wrote a letter to the court about the experience: "I will never forget the smell of the place and what I had seen," Superior Court Judge Harvey Giss read from the letter on Thursday. "My mind would never let me forget that those were the result of DUI."

The judge recited Valencia's words on Thursday before ruling there was enough evidence to order the 21-year-old Canyon Country man to stand trial in a third DUI case - this one fatal.

On July 11, Valencia plowed his truck into a group of bicyclists on a remote stretch of Bouquet Canyon Road, killing a Stevenson Ranch man and severely injuring others while he was drunk on alcohol and high on methamphetamine, cocaine and marijuana, prosecutors said.

He faces 13 criminal counts, including murder, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, hit-and-run and several DUI charges, according to court documents. After testimony, Giss set Valencia's bail at $1.3 million dollars and scheduled him to return to court on Dec. 24.

The deadly crash occurred just months after Valencia wrote the seemingly heartfelt letter in November 2008, pledging to turn his life around.

Tests taken after the crash showed Valencia had a blood alcohol level of about .18 percent - more than double the legal limit - and other drugs in his bloodstream, said Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney John Allen Ramseyer.

"The defendant clearly exhibited the willful, wanton disregard for human life," Ramseyer said.

One witness to the crash, Sheldon Haselwood, testified that he followed Valencia for miles as the suspect weaved in and out of lanes, crashing into a fence before he hit the bicyclists and sped off into the canyons.

Valencia was driving on the wrong side of the road, Haselwood testified.

CHP investigating officer Mark Griffith said fibers found on the driver-side door of Valencia's truck matched the handlebar tape from the bike ridden by Joseph Novotny, the rider who was killed.

Clothing fibers that matched Novotny's bicycle shorts also were found on the front of the truck, Griffith said.

Valencia also was seen by a witness the night before drinking with friends, Griffith added.

The deputy who arrested Valencia the day of the crash said he spotted the truck that matched witnesses' descriptions about 12 to 15 miles north of the accident, but the driver immediately sped off, leading him on a short chase.

The truck ran into a dirt embankment and stopped, and Valencia stepped out, said Los Angeles County sheriff's Deputy Jeffrey Burrow.

He then pleaded with the deputy to end his life.

"He told me to shoot him," Burrow said, "that his life was over."


Thursday, January 28, 2010

Kerry's Daughter Won't Be Charged With DUI

Prosecutors say John Kerry's eldest daughter won't be charged with drunken driving in Los Angeles.

Police arrested Alexandra Kerry in Hollywood last week on suspicion that she was driving under the influence.

Los Angeles city attorney spokesman Frank Mateljan says prosecutors declined to pursue a case due to insufficient evidence.

He says prosecutors didn't offer any further details.

A spokeswoman for John Kerry said last week that the Massachusetts senator's daughter was pulled over for an expired registration and released after a breathalyzer test showed her blood-alcohol level was under the legal limit.

Mateljan says Alexandra Kerry isn't facing any other charges.

The 36-year-old has produced documentaries and has had several small acting roles.\

Source

Friday, January 15, 2010

Former Public Defender Offers Local DUI Defense

Pasadena attorney Ann A. Gottesman, a former deputy public defender in Riverside, opened a new office in Pasadena in April of 2009. As a litigator with experience working with the judges and prosecutors of the area, she is in a position to offer an educated local defense for those accused with driving under the influence (DUI).

“Ann A. Gottesman is the best possible choice for someone accused of driving under the influence here in Pasadena,” said a spokesperson for the firm. “Her service in the public defenders office not only gave her the experience to win cases, but also familiarized her with judges and prosecutors that other local attorneys have yet to meet. This enables her to get the job done more efficiently and save her clients excessive fines and/or jail time.”

A conviction for a first offense for DUI in California brings with it a fine of $390 to $1000 and a jail or prison term of 24 hours to six months. It also comes with a license suspension of six months, with the opportunity to obtain a restricted license after 30 days. If convicted a second time in a ten year period the jail term can be up to one year and the license suspension is up to two years. From there, the fines and incarceration periods get higher and longer respectively for each additional offense within a ten year period.

“Avoiding the first conviction is critical,” said our spokesperson. “Once the courts have found you guilty the first time you can get caught in an endless cycle that could result in permanent loss of license. Even minor infractions after that will be examined closely and you’ll be tested for intoxication every time you get pulled over. Ann A. Gottesman fights hard for her clients to avoid a first conviction and her track record of success proves that she’s extremely good at it.”

In addition to being a Pasadena DUI attorney, Ann A. Gottesman is also a successful Pasadena criminal attorney specializing in drug cases, theft, and domestic violence. She clerked for Justice Earl Johnson Jr., of the Second District Court of Appeal while in law school and worked for Marilee Marshall and Associates, a Los Angeles firm specializing in criminal appellate law before becoming an associate for the Law Office of Michael Cabrera in 2006. Prior to private practice she was a public defender in Riverside.

Source

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Actress Joyce Dewitt charged with DUI

Veteran actress Joyce Dewitt has been hit with two charges of driving under the influence  following her arrest in her native California earlier this year.
The 60 year old, best known for her role as Janet Wood on hit 1980s TV show Three's Company, was arrested in El Segundo on July 4 after driving past a traffic barricade.
The actress was taken into police custody after reportedly failing field sobriety tests and was later released on $5,000 bail.
A complaint filed on Tuesday by the Los Angeles County District Attorney shows she had been driving with a blood alcohol level of .15 - twice the state's legal limit.
She has been charged with one count of driving under the influence and one count of driving while having a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher,

Source

Saturday, November 28, 2009

These Doughnuts the Los Angeles Police Don’t Like

As of late, many residents of the Crenshaw-Leimert Park area have been able to sleep a little more soundly on Saturday nights. Their sleep aid: the increased presence of the Los Angeles Police Department and the California Highway Patrol.

Earlier this year, cruising and street racing on Crenshaw Boulevard not only awakened many residents with the sounds of screeching tires, racing engines and loud music, but it kept late-night commuters confined at various points on the thoroughfare.

In the Bay Area of Northern California, the phenomenon of young people engaging in this activity is known as “side shows” and

“yokin’ ”. Officials and residents in the Crenshaw-Leimert area have their own names for it: nuisance and illegal.

Resources to combat the problem were increased in July, according to Renee Bevel, a crime intelligence analyst with LAPD’s South Bureau. The plan included officers from the CHP, LAPD senior lead officers, motorcycle officers and regular patrol units.

Residents say they were able to set their clocks by when the nuisances would occur: usually late Saturday nights/early Sunday mornings, mostly between 2 and 4 a.m. Signs of the previous night’s activities would be visible by dawn: several fresh, black tire marks along the boulevard from where street racers would do “donuts” — spin their cars around in circles — or burn rubber from a stationary position, usually at an intersection.

Stuart H., a resident who lives about two blocks from Crenshaw Boulevard and 54th Street, says he remembers being awakened routinely between 1:30 and 3:30 a.m. on Sunday mornings to the sound of screeching tires.

“We could actually smell the rubber burning,” said Stuart, whose last name was withheld for safety reasons. “From where I live, I could hear the voices of people on the street yelling and screaming on Crenshaw. It was crazy.”

Additional resources were made available to the LAPD to free up officers for this issue prior to meetings with concerned residents, according to LAPD Deputy Chief Kirk Albanese.

Since the suppression detail went into effect, Stuart says that his “nights are very quiet. I think that just their (the LAPD’s) presence has stopped the (activity.) We’ve been able to sleep through the night.”

The LAPD’s strategy for addressing the issue has been focused mainly on visibility, enforcement and education.

At a meeting with residents at the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza in August, Albanese stressed that the police department has to be very careful in its response to the cruisers and street racers.

Albanese admitted that, prior to the suppression plan, police officers had been “part of the problem by not engaging in simple traffic stops.”

While cruising is not illegal, there have been times when traffic has been impacted.

“We have to be mindful of the crime being committed,” Albanese said. “The Constitution gives people the right to gather, to assemble.”

Residents of the corridor say that the issue is not the gathering that is the problem but everything that comes along with it: loud noise, the holding up of traffic, cruising at dangerous speed levels, driving the wrong way on the thoroughfare, and the donuts in the middle of the street.

The enforcement aspect of the LAPD’s suppression plan has resulted in some significant crime numbers, according to the city attorney’s office.

Sharee L. Sanders is the deputy city attorney assigned to the Crenshaw Area Project, which encompasses the area where gatherings took place.

Sanders said that during the time period between March through Aug. 8, 823 vehicle citations have been issued and 96 cars were impounded; six stolen vehicles have been recovered and 47 arrests have been made for outstanding warrants.

There also were 28 DUI (Driving Under the Influence) arrests; six felony arrests have been made; one gun has been removed; and five juveniles under 18 have been arrested for being in violation of the 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew.

During the last two weekends of August, there were 232 citations issued; three felony and  32 misdemeanor arrests made; 17 people were arrested for DUI, and 20 cars were impounded, Sanders said.

The plan is also part of the crime abatement strategy of the Urban League’s Neighborhoods At Work initiative. The initiative is a five-year project to increase the quality of life in the 70-block perimeter that borders Vernon Avenue on the north; Arlington Avenue on the east; Slauson Avenue to the south; and Crenshaw Boulevard on the west, extending to Hillcrest Boulevard to an extent. As part of the crime abatement strategy, the Urban League requested resources for this area from the LAPD, the city attorney’s office and the CHP.

CHP, working in conjunction with LAPD, patrols the area from about 8 p.m. Saturday to 6 a.m. Sunday, said to Sgt. Lee Martin of CHP.

The city attorney’s office handles all of the misdemeanor vehicular charges that occur such as unsafe driving, speeding, hanging out of doors, on top of cars and racing.

Sanders, who says she grew up in the area and remembers the phenomenon of cruising from her younger days, says the foremost concern is for safety.

“A lot of students and young people are involved in the cruising,” she says. “Although a lot of what happens in the neighborhood is not done necessarily by … youth who live in this neighborhood, it is still young people.”

The suppression plan along Crenshaw Boulevard is scheduled to continue until at least Oct. 5, which is when an overall assessment of the plan’s success will be made.


Source

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Drunken driving suit delayed third time

Bogged down by last-minute deposition requests, a flurry of 11th-hour motions and the sluggish pace at which civil litigation generally moves, the auto negligence lawsuit against William "Billy" Nichols Jr. has been delayed for a third time.

Although the trial was scheduled to begin today, a circuit judge chose to postpone it until January rather than flirt with the possibility of appellate admonishment down the road.

"This case isn't going to be reversed because of procedural debates," Circuit Judge Brian Lambert said recently as lawyers on both sides squabbled over matters like the timely meeting of discovery deadlines and the unexpected announcement of new witnesses.

While legal counsel seemed worn down, if somewhat unsurprised by the judge's order to push back the trial date, no one looked more defeated than the plaintiff, Adrian "Stretch" Cummings.

"I'm broken-hearted," said the Vietnam War veteran, his tall and lanky frame hunched in disappointment. "I want some final closure on this and they won't give it to me. I just want justice."

It's been nearly five years since that fateful Nov. 26, 2004, morning when Cummings' wife, Nancy, 55, and daughter Holly, 25, were killed.

Nichols' Ford F-250 pickup crossed over the center lane and smashed into their Ford Tempo, crushing the two women to death.

Nichols' blood-alcohol content, taken two hours after the crash, registered at 0.103 and 0.104; the point at which a driver is presumed to be impaired is 0.08.

Paramedics recalled a near-hysterical Nichols in the aftermath. But if the wreck left Nichols - the sole survivor - dazed, the verdict at his criminal trial left a community stunned.

A Marion County jury acquitted the Ocala Water Spots Surf Ski and Skate Shop owner on two counts of DUI manslaughter. A circuit judge dropped two additional counts of vehicular homicide.

It was a controversial acquittal that reverberated across town in the form of angry letters to the editor, furious blog posts and general disbelief in the criminal justice system.

But there was chance yet for Cummings, the 61-year-old widower who stretches more than 6 feet tall, to find solace in the justice system.

A year after the deaths, in November 2005, Cummings filed a civil complaint against Nichols, alleging the business owner was negligent in causing the accident by being intoxicated and failing to maintain control of his vehicle.

Seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, the lawsuit wended its way through the civil docket, going through at least one judge change, and reams of electronically filed paperwork.

Almost immediately after Nichols' October 2007 acquittal on his criminal charges, his civil defense attorney sought a change of venue in the civil trial due to pretrial publicity.

On Sept. 4, Judge Lambert finally heard that motion and denied it by raising the inevitable O.J. Simpson analogy.

"Where did they try [Simpson's] civil case? They didn't go to San Francisco, did they?" the judge asked defense attorney Michael Donsky.

Los Angeles-area juries heard the criminal and civil cases against the football star.

Lambert will allow for prospective jurors to be individually questioned concerning their knowledge of the two-year-old criminal case.

No mention of Nichols' arrest or his subsequent criminal prosecution will be allowed at his civil trial.

But it will be a while until jury selection even begins.

Over the next several months, attorneys will have the opportunity to depose new witnesses, such as Earle Traynam, an economist whom plaintiff's attorney Scott Parks noticed as a witness just days before the discovery cutoff date. It was a last-minute filing that incurred the wrath of both the judge and opposing counsel.

"We wanted [the trial] over," defense attorney Donsky said. "There's not nearly much more we had to do."

Parks will call on Traynam to assess the potential future earnings of Nancy Cummings. She and her daughter were nurses at Leesburg Regional Medical Center.

The mother-daughter pair were on their to work when the crash occurred in Ocklawaha early in the morning.

Another reason for the trial's continuance was Parks' delayed request to depose two defense witnesses: Stephen Curry and Leonard Masten,

"He waits to tell me he needs two of my experts for depositions when they've been available forever," Donsky told the judge with a sigh earlier this month.

Those witnesses - a pharmacologist and toxicologist, respectively - played a prominent role in Nichols' defense during the criminal trial.

According to a former jury member, one of the main reasons for Nichols' acquittal was the introduction at trial of a medical phenomenon known as delayed gastric emptying. Nichols, now 45, supposedly experienced this medical condition at the time of the crash.

That was the "big, major thing" that led Josephine Eckert and her fellow jurors to reach their not-guilty verdict.

That theory helped debunk the notion that Nichols, a one-time champion barefoot skier, was actually intoxicated, and therefore criminally negligent, when he was behind the wheel in November 2004.

Nichols consumed at least five beers and five ounces of Crown Royal whiskey on Thanksgiving, which was the day prior to the accident. He also ate a large greasy meal, the contents of which, the experts said, decreased Nichols' gastric emptying time.

Masten testified that the combination of the alcohol and food, followed shortly thereafter by sleep, had caused Nichols' pyloric valve - which processes alcohol into the bloodstream - to close and not reopen until after the crash.

That scientific theory, though largely scorned by the public, convinced the jury. Eckert said the decision still weighs heavily on her.

"I hope I never have to make a decision like that again," she said. "I get a real sick feeling when I see [Nichols'] business when I pass it."

In the civil action, Nichols' defense lawyer asserts his client was not at fault in the accident, that it was a mechanical failure on his Ford truck and the road's improper maintenance that caused Nichols to swerve into the oncoming lane and lose control of his vehicle.

Adrian Cummings isn't buying it. The accident would have been preventable "except that [Nichols] was drunk," he said late last year.

Cummings, who lives in the Ocala National Forest and occasionally speaks before the Marion County Victim Impact Panel, declined to sit for an extended interview, but has remained a fixture in court during the many hearings.

Nichols, who is not required to be present, has been noticeably absent.

"I haven't missed a date yet. I have an obligation to my family," Cummings said earlier this month. "It's hard and it hurts but if it [the lawsuit] makes one person think before they get behind the wheel of a car, it hurts less," he added.

The war veteran, who met and married his wife upon returning from Vietnam, was left widowed and daughterless after the accident, but has a son who lives nearby who is in his mid-30s. The father expresses hope that come January, a jury will see his side.

"I hope after this verdict, I can say the Pledge of Allegiance in Marion County," he said.


Source

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Reporter Exposes California DUI Lawyer Practices

An investigative reporter for California
Lawyer magazine, a professional publication for all members of the California
State Bar, has recently delved into the practices of California DUI attorneys.
 In the magazine's cover article, titled "The DUI Defense Bar," reporter Tom
McNichol took a hard and long-overdue look at the good, the bad and the ugly
among DUI lawyers:

         At one end of the spectrum are the specialists who've spent much of
         their professional lives mastering arcane technical issues such as
         blood and breath partition ratios, microbial contamination in
         urinalysis, and the perils of retrograde extrapolation in chemical
         tests. These attorneys typically charge anywhere from $3,500 to
         $10,000 to defend a first offender, not including the expert witness
         fees or lab tests that may be required. Top expert witnesses with
         national reputations can easily push the total cost closer to
         $20,000.

         At the other end of the spectrum are cut-rate practitioners with no
         particular expertise, who charge as little as $1,000 per case. These
         include "dump truck" lawyers, who sign up as many clients as possible
         and then dump them all on the guilty-plea docket; and "escort"
         lawyers, who escort clients up to the judge like a high-paid call
         girl, plead them guilty, and then disappear with the money.


         These DUI mills typically offer a lowball rate to clients, and they
         tend to give commensurate service. One California attorney who
         advertises his "cheap DUI defense" widely on the Internet pitches
         prospective clients: "We do the same thing over and over again. There
         is simply no reason to spend thousands of dollars on your defense. We
         charge about half of the going rate."...


McNichol then took a look at the other end of the professional scale, focusing
on Los Angeles DUI lawyer Lawrence Taylor, known nationally as the "Dean of
DUI Attorneys" and author of the standard text on the subject, Drunk Driving
Defense :

         By punching enough holes in the prosecution's case, a good DUI lawyer
         can, if not exonerate a client, then at least knock the charge down
         to what's known in the trade as a "wet reckless"--an alcohol-related
         reckless driving offense.

         This is where defendants often get from their lawyers what they pay
         for. At the Law Offices of Lawrence Taylor, Inc.--where attorneys
         devoted exclusively to DUI cases charge top dollar--blood and urine
         samples are routinely reanalyzed; breathalyzer maintenance,
         calibration, and administration are investigated; and sometimes the
         scene of an arrest is revisited. Taylor's firm also boasts a support
         staff that includes a forensic toxicologist who once did DUI testing
         for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's crime lab, a former hearing
         officer for the DMV, and a former police officer who was on the Santa
         Ana department's DUI task force. That's a far cry from the firms
         where lawyers, by their own admission, "do the same thing over and
         over again."


Source